Summary
WAIS
Raven’s Progressive Matrices
Brain size
Evolutionary Explainations
Summary
-I.Q of an adult male 3.1 to 5.1 points higher (δ male-female 0.25 to 0.34SD).
-Faster development for women, but peaks earlier (parallel to physical growth).
-I.Q of men becomes superior at about 16 years.
-Size of the brain of adult men bigger by 110 to 150 cubic cm (δ = 0.57 SD).
-19.3 billion neurons in women, 22.8 billion neurons in men.
-Highest cortical thickness in men (δ = 0.28SD)
-Men also have quicker Reaction Time (Deary, 2006 Ritchie, 2018), a consequence of the positive correlation between I.Q and reaction time.
Fig. 1. Total sample male and female general intelligence g (HFA/S–L, see text) distributions and male–female ratio as a function of male g = .23 (SD = 1.03) and female g = .23 (SD = .93). Nmales = 90 (mean age 13.0, SD = 3.54) and Nfemales = 91 (mean age 12.8, SD = 3.6).
In Detail
The brain size of adult men is about 110 cc (0.78 SD) larger. The IQ-brain size correlation is +0.44, so the theoretical male superiority in adulthood is (0.78×0.44) = 0.35SD, ie in IQ points: (0.35×15) = 5.1 IQ points, exactly what is found empirically in the tests.
Development
A problem that has sometimes been raised as part of the positive relationship between brain size and intelligence is that women have smaller brains than men and yet it has been virtually universally claimed that there was no differences of intelligence between men and women.
For example, “women’s brains are 10% smaller than men’s, but their IQ is on average the same” (Butterworth 1999: 293). Since women with a smaller brain size would be as smart as men, it appears that brain size has no effect on intelligence. This is the conclusion drawn by Gould (1996, p.132), who writes that he refutes “the myth that differences in brain size would have a relationship to intelligence” The smaller average size of women’s brains has been demonstrated by Ankney (1992) and Rushton (1992). Ankney has calculated that the average men’s brain, adjusted for body size, is 100 grams heavier. Rushton calculated from another set of data from 6325 military men that the brain average, adjusted for body size, is 1442cc for men and 1332cc for women, a male advantage of 110cc; 1CC of brain tissue weighs about 1 gram, so that the results of Ankney and Rushton are very similar.
So we have a paradox: the size of the brain is positively related to intelligence, men have on average a larger brain, and yet men and women would have the same intelligence.
Richard Lynn presented the resolution of this paradox in Lynn (1994 and 1999) and in Lynn and Irwing (2004).
Up to the age of 15 years, males and females have approximately the same intelligence, except for a small male advantage on the visualization abilities; however, from the age of 16 years, males begin to show greater intelligence, reaching an advantage of from three to five IQ points in adults. This has been further confirmed by Paul Irwing and myself (Irwing & Lynn, 2005; Irwing, 2012), by Victoria Bourne, Helen Fox, Ian Deary, and Lawrence Whalley (2007).
This advantage is fully explicable by the larger size of mens’ brain. Men and women experience the same environment and therefore environmental factors can not account for the difference between men and women. The evolutionary explanation of the average slightly higher intelligence of men is that men compete with each other to obtain women and in the evolution of hominids, the intelligence played an important role. Women do not compete for men.
Coming to corroborate male intellectual advantage, Deary has shown that men have a faster reaction time (RT) than women. This is a consequence of the positive correlation between simple reaction times and Q.I.
A new study (2019) on 10,300 Spaniards again confirmed the difference in speed of development between the sexes, with a small male cognitive advantage in adulthood.
In adulthood, men’s I.Q is on average slightly higher (4-5 I.Q points).
Below, summary of sex differences found at the national level. A minus sign indicates a female advantage (only in Argentina). For all studies, the male intellectual advantage is 0.206SD, ie 3.1 points of Q.I.
Summary on Sex Differences in Intelligence by Richard Lynn (2017).
Click to enlarge
WAIS Full Scale IQ
All 42 studies show a male advantage, median +0.24sd or 4 IQ points
Table 5.5. Sex differences on the WAIS Full Scale IQ and Performance subtests; (ds; positive signs denote males score higher)
Country | Test: N | FS IQ | Reference |
Brazil | WAIS-III: 3494 | .07 | Victora et al., 2015 |
Canada | WAIS-III: 1104 | .11 | Longman et al., 2007 |
Chile | WAIS-IV: 887 | .20 | Diaz & Lynn, 2016 |
China | WAIS-R:1406 | .24 | Dai et al., 1991 |
China | WAIS-R:1979 | .33 | Lynn & Dai, 1993 |
China | WAIS-R:120 | .43 | Yao et al., 2004 |
China | WAIS-111:888 | .29 | Chen & Lynn , 2020c |
China | WAIS IV:311 | .62 | Gao et al., 2015 |
Canada | WAIS 111:1104 | .11 | Longman et al., 2007 |
Denmark | WAIS:62 | .21 | Nyborg, 2005 |
Germany | WAIS-IV:1425 | .21 | Daseking et al., 2017 |
Italy | WAIS-R:1168 | .45 | Tommasi et al., 2015 |
Japan | WAIS-R:1402 | .22 | Hattori & Lynn, 1997 |
Netherlands | WAIS:2100 | .27 | Stinissen, 1977 |
Netherlands | WAIS 111:522 | .24 | Van der Sluis et al, 2006 |
Romania | WAIS:100 | .44 | Dumitrascu, 1999 |
Romania: Roma | WAIS:100 | .44 | Dumitrascu, 1999 |
Russia | WAIS:296 | .13 | Grigoriev et al, 2016 |
Russia | WAIS:1800 | .22 | Grigoriev et al, 2016 |
Scotland | WAIS-R:200 | .39 | Lynn, 1998 |
South Korea | WAIS-IV:1228 | .31 | Lynn & Hur, 2016 |
Spain | WAIS 111:1369 | .24 | Colom et al., 2002 |
Sudan | WAIS-R:330 | .31 | Sulman et al, 2018 |
Sudan | WAIS-R:319 | .21 | Sulman et al, 2018 |
Taiwan | WAIS 111:888 | .29 | Chen & Lynn, 2021a |
Taiwan | WAIS 1V:1105 | .35 | Chen & Lynn, 2018 |
United States | W-Bell:235 | .59 | Strange & Palmer, 1953 |
United States | W-Bell:153 | .20 | Norman, 1953 |
United States | W-Bell:392 | .29 | Goolishian & Foster, 1954 |
United States | WAIS:1700 | .10 | Matarazzo, 1972 |
United States | WAIS:279 | .40 | Boor, 1975 |
United States | WAIS:588 | .17 | Horn et al., 1979 |
United States | WAIS:521 | .13 | Turner & Willerman, 1977 |
United States | WAIS:649 | .09 | Doppelt & Wallace, 1955 |
United States | WAIS:649 | .09 | Doppelt & Wallace, 1955 |
United States | WAIS:100 | .33 | Shaw, 1965 |
United States | WAIS-R:230 | .27 | Arceneaux et al., 1996 |
United States | WAIS-R:206 | .28 | Ilai & Willerman, 1989 |
United States | WAIS-R:1880 | .15 | Matarazzo et al., 1986 |
United States | WAIS-III: 2450 | .18 | Irwing, 2912 |
United States | WAIS IV:2200 | .15 | Piffer, 2016 |
United States | WAIS 111: 850 | .04 | Du Pont et al., 2020 |
Median | .24 |
WAIS Full Scale IQ
32 studies on 33 show a male advantage, median +0.3 (4.5 IQ points)
Table 4.3. Sex differences (ds) for the Standard and Advanced Progressive Matrices in general population samples aged 20-80 years. Minus signs denote higher means obtained by females.
Country | N:M | N:F | d | Reference |
Britain | 300 | 240 | .29 | Heron & Chown, 1967 |
Hungary | 250 | 250 | .17 | Szegedi, 1974 |
Israel | 100 | 100 | .31 | Guttman, 1974. |
Hawaii | 939 | 971 | .37 | Wilson et al., 1975 |
Taiwan | 225 | 225 | 1.33 | Adair & Pollitt, 1985 |
Belgium | 850 | 979 | .31 | Deltour, 1993 |
Belgium | 101 | 174 | .38 | Deltour, 1993 |
USA | 63 | 80 | .16 | Sitkei & Michael, 1996 |
Belgium ** | 564 | 802 | .21 | Dufouil et al., 1997 |
Brazil | 1921 | 741 | .28 | Campos, 1999 |
USA** | 92 | 114 | .31 | Salthouse, 2001 |
Scotland | 210 | 217 | .11 | Deary et al., 2004 |
Scotland | 230 | 313 | .29 | Deary et al., 2004 |
Guatemala | 683 | 786 | .52 | Martorell et al., 2005 |
Brazil** | 104 | 265 | .49 | Rossetti et al., 2009 |
Pakistan | 997 | 1019 | .04 | Ahmad et al., 2008 |
Morocco | 92 | 110 | .38 | Sellami et al., 2010 |
Spain | 101 | 157 | .15 | Diaz et al., 2010. |
Sudan | 115 | 125 | .12 | Khaleefa et al., 2010 |
N. Zealand | 143 | 187 | .22 | Fletcher & Hattie, 2011 |
Argentina | 374 | 390 | -.02 | Flynn, 2012 |
Libya | 300 | 300 | .37 | Al-Shahomee, 2012 |
Libya | 260 | 260 | .36 | Al-Shahomee & Lynn, 2012 |
Brazil** | 454 | 534 | .10 | Flores-Mendoza et al., 2013 |
Brazil** | 161 | 386 | .65 | Braga et al., 2014 |
Serbia | 62 | 74 | .27 | Čvorović & Lynn, 2014 |
Romania* | 618 | 823 | .18 | Iliescu et al., 2016 |
Australia** | 128 | 327 | .30 | Waschl et al, 2016 |
Brazil** | 381 | 216 | .43 | Flores-Mendoza et al., 2016 |
USA*** | 393 | 503 | .21 | Van der Linden et al., 2017 |
Poland** | 218 | 218 | .12 | Gignac & Zajenkowski, 2019 |
USA*** | 346 | 399 | .05 | Du Pont et al., 2020 |
Portugal | 250 | 272 | .34 | Queiro-Garcia et al., 2021 |
Median | – | – | .30 | – |
*Progressive Matrices Plus; **Advanced Progressive Matrices; *** Advanced Progressive Matrices Short Form
References for the whole page
“Race differences in intelligence. An evolutionary Analysis“, Chapiter 16, Richard Lynn, Washington Summit Publisher 2nd edition 2015.
“Age and sex differences in reaction time in adulthood, results from the United Kingdom health and lifestyle survey”, Psychology and aging (2006), Ian J. Deary.
Van Der Linden D., Curtis S.D. et Madison G. (2017) “Sex differences in brain size and general intelligence (g)”, Intelligence.
Lynn R., Irwing P. (2006) “Intelligence: Is there a sex difference in IQ scores ?” Nature 442, E1, doi:10.1038/nature04966.
Arribas D., Aguilaa F. et al. (2019) “Testing the developmental theory of sex differences in intelligence using latent modeling: Evidence from the TEA Ability Battery (BAT-7)”
Lynn R. (2017) Sex Differences in Intelligence. Reply to Comments. Mankind Quarterly 58:1145-156.